Search Completed | Title | Safety of Grid Scale Lithium-ion Battery Energy Storage Systems
Original File Name Searched: EN010106-004026-DL2-Li-ion-BESS-safety-concerns_Redacted.pdf | Google It | Yahoo | Bing

Page | 011 – 10 – June 5, 2021 2. Leading Concerns The main concerns regarding large scale Li-ion BESS are: 1) The potential for failure in a single cell (out of many thousands) to propagate to neighbouring cells by the process known as “thermal runaway”. Believed to be initiated by lithium metal dendrites growing internally to the cell, a cell may simply discharge internally releasing its stored energy as heat. Even sound Li-ion cells will spontaneously discharge internally if heated to temperatures which can be as low as 150 °C, releasing their stored electrical energy, thus overheating neighbouring cells and so on. Temperatures sufficient to melt aluminium (660 °C) at least have been inferred from analyses of such thermal runaway accidents. Eye-witness reports consistently speak of repeated “re-ignition” which is inevitable, even in the complete absence of oxygen, so long as the temperature anywhere exceeds the thermal runaway initiation threshold. 2) The emission of highly toxic gases – principally Hydrogen Fluoride – for prolonged periods, in the event of thermal runaway or other battery fires. At a minimum, respirators and complete skin protection would be required by any fire-fighters. Measures to protect the public from toxic plumes would also be necessary. 3) The emission of large quantities of highly inflammable gases such as Hydrogen, Methane, Ethylene and Carbon Monoxide even if a fire suppression system is deployed. These gases will be evolved from a thermal runaway accident regardless of such measures, with explosion potential as soon as they are mixed with air and in contact with hot surfaces. Such an explosion was the cause of the “deflagration event” at McMicken, Arizona in 2019 in a 2 MWh BESS, which critically injured four fire-fighters and was triggered simply by opening the cabin door. 4) The absence of any adequate engineering and regulatory standards to prevent or mitigate the consequences of “thermal runaway” accidents in Li-ion BESS. 5) The potential for thermal runaway in one cabin propagating to a neighbouring cabin. In Arizona [3] there were reports of “fires with 10-15 feet flame lengths that grew into 50 - 75 feet flame lengths appearing to be fed by flammable liquids coming from the cabinets”. 6) The significant volumes of water required to thoroughly cool the system in the event of a “fire”, and how this water will be contained and disposed of (since this will be contaminated with highly corrosive hydrofluoric acid and, therefore, must not be allowed to drain into the surrounding environment). Such incidents are routinely and repeatedly described in the Press as “battery fires” though they are not “fires” at all in the usual sense of the word; oxygen is completely uninvolved. They represent an electrochemical discharge between chemical components that are self-reactive. They do not require air or oxygen at all to proceed. Hence the traditional “fire triangle” of “Heat, Oxygen, Fuel” simply does not apply, and conventional fire-fighting strategies are likely to fail (Figure 10, over). Thermal runaway events are uncontrollable except by cooling all parts of the structure affected – even the deepest internal parts – below 150 °C. This basically requires water, in large volumes.
|