PDF Publication Title:
Text from PDF Page: 007
pubs.acs.org/JACS Correction to “Extending the Lifetime of Organic Flow Batteries via Redox State Management” Marc-Antoni Goulet, Liuchuan Tong, Daniel A. Pollack, Daniel P. Tabor, Susan A. Odom, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Eugene E. Kwan,* Roy G. Gordon,* and Michael J. Aziz* J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (20), 8014−8019. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b13295 Cite This: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c05529 ACCESS Metrics & More The additional data presented herein is intended to revisit a previous claim based upon Figure 4 of the original publication. More extensive trials now expose a clear trend between the restriction of negolyte state of charge (SOC) and the capacity fade rate of the DHAQ/Fe(CN)6 flow battery. The authors now consider the fade rate of 0.14%/day claimed in the main text to be an outlier, as depicted by the red cross in Figure 1 below, and the data in Figure S23 of the original Supporting Information to be more representative of the achievable fade rate with an 88% SOC restriction. Upon further investigation, it was determined that cell cycling history is the most likely source of the discrepancy. The cell and electrolyte used in the experiment shown in Figure 4 of the original publication had undergone prior cycling, thereby accumulating the DHA decomposition product and slowing the rate of further decomposition; in contrast, the data for Figure S23 come from a pristine cell and electrolyte. This consideration was overlooked in the original analysis and can be an important direction for future study. The overall conclusions of the original study remain unchanged. The present data affect only the degree to which the SOC restriction strategy minimizes the formation of the anthrone decomposition product of the fresh DHAQ negolyte. More specifically, the data herein indicate that a 10-fold (from 4.5 to 0.49%/day at 80% SOC restriction) or 15-fold (from 4.5 to 0.29%/day at 50% SOC restriction) decrease in capacity loss rate can be reproducibly achieved through SOC restriction alone, but not a 40-fold decrease (from 5.6 to 0.14%/day), as originally published. In addition, the aggregate data in Figure 1, collected under various conditions over an entire year, indicate the robustness of the trend to seasonal variability (∼5 °C). Although most of the data in Figure 1 were obtained with a Coulombic capacity cutoff as in Figure S23, a few of the cell runs at 50% and 80% SOC restriction were obtained with a potential-controlled SOC cutoff similar to that used in Figure 4 of the original publication. Within error, these different cutoff conditions produce indistinguishable results, thereby showing that the type of cutoff condition is not the cause of the original discrepancy. In addition, the aggregate data contain cell runs at two different electrolyte concentrations, which suggests that the lifetime extension strategy is applicable to practical battery concentrations. Read Online Addition/Correction Article Recommendations © XXXX American Chemical Society Figure 1. Aggregate cycling data from pristine cells and electrolytes elucidating a trend in capacity fade rate as a function of DHAQ negolyte SOC restriction. All data were obtained by comparing capacity immediately before and after SOC-restricted segments. All cells were cycled galvanostatically with potential holds and composed of one of two possible electrolyte formulations consisting of either 0.1 M DHAQ in 1.2 M KOH as negolyte vs 0.07 M K4[Fe(CN)6] and 0.01 M K3[Fe(CN)6] in 1 M KOH as posolyte, or 0.5 M DHAQ in 2 M KOH as negolyte vs 0.35 M K4[Fe(CN)6] and 0.05 M K3[Fe(CN)6] in 1 M KOH as posolyte, where the posolytes generally have 6× the volume and therefore >2× the capacity of the negolytes. The green triangle data point at 88% SOC restriction is from Figure S23 in the Supporting Information of the original publication, whereas the red cross represents the result from Figure 4 of the original main text. Data points at 50%, 80%, 98%, and 99% SOC restriction each consist of at least five cell runs. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c05529 A J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX Downloaded via CONCORDIA UNIV on August 23, 2021 at 12:26:12 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.PDF Image | Extending organic flow batteries via redox state management
PDF Search Title:
Extending organic flow batteries via redox state managementOriginal File Name Searched:
mja287.pdfDIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing
Salgenx Redox Flow Battery Technology: Salt water flow battery technology with low cost and great energy density that can be used for power storage and thermal storage. Let us de-risk your production using our license. Our aqueous flow battery is less cost than Tesla Megapack and available faster. Redox flow battery. No membrane needed like with Vanadium, or Bromine. Salgenx flow battery
CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@salgenx.com (Standard Web Page)