The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology

PDF Publication Title:

The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology ( the-energy-consumption-blockchain-technology )

Previous Page View | Next Page View | Return to Search List

Text from PDF Page: 006

604 J. Sedlmeir et al.: The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology, Bus Inf Syst Eng 62(6):599–608 (2020) Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism. In this case, the weight of a participant’s vote is not tied to the scarce resource of computing power, but to the scarce resource of capital (see Sect. 2.1 on why coupling with a scarce resource is necessary). More precisely, there is a random mechanism (there are no truly random number generators for classical computers, but, as a first approximation, this heuristics provides a good indication. The pseudo-ran- domness typically comes from a subset of the previous blocks) that determines who is allowed to build (‘‘mint’’, ‘‘forge’’, ‘‘bake’’) and attach the next block. With the help of this mechanism, the probability of being selected is linked to the amount of cryptocurrency that the node has deposited and locked (‘‘staked’’) for this purpose. The deposit also incentivizes the node to stick to the rules of the network, as any misbehavior detected will lead to the node losing this deposit. The advantage of PoS is that it does not involve any computationally intensive steps such as solv- ing the cryptographic puzzles in PoW. The computational complexity of PoS consensus is low and, typically, insen- sitive to network size. It is, therefore, very energy-efficient for large-scale systems. Accordingly, based on our argu- ments regarding the energy consumption associated with operating transactions in Sect. 2, the energy consumption of PoS blockchains is several orders of magnitude lower than that of PoW. It is primarily for this reason that the community of the cryptocurrency with the currently sec- ond-highest market capitalization, Ethereum, is trying to switch from PoW to PoS. Other cryptocurrencies, such as EOS, Tezos, and TRON – all of which feature in the Top 20 cryptocurrencies in terms of market capitalization – are already successfully using PoS. There are, however, con- troversial discussions in the community. Some argue that getting rid of PoW’s energy consumption comes at the price of security, e.g., because one can only accrue voting weight (capital) from inside the system. However, one can also argue that PoS has less of a tendency to centralize (mining has economies of scale) and is, thus, more secure in the long run. We will not enter in this discussion up here but want to highlight that the outcome will likely decide which consensus-type for permissionless blockchains pre- vails and, therefore, impacts the energy consumption of future open decentralized applications. On the other hand, blockchain technology can also be useful in constellations in which only a restricted group of participants take part in consensus. These are referred to as permissioned blockchains. They are of particular interest to many industries and, also, to the public sector: participants usually build a consortium, and there is a registration process meaning that all of the participants in consensus are known (Fridgen et al. 2018b; Rieger et al. 2019). Therefore, it is not necessary to tie voting weight to a scarce resource here, and one can reach consensus using some kind of election in which everyone has a single vote. Therefore, this kind of consensus mechanism is sometimes called Proof-of-Identity or, very often, Proof-of-Authority (PoA). The term PoA usually involves different levels of security, from mathematically proven and long-established, fully fault-tolerant mechanisms (Paxos, PBFT) over heuristically-secure algorithms, such as Istanbul BFT and Aura, to basic crash-tolerant mechanisms such as RAFT (De Angelis et al. 2017). Popular implementations of such permissioned blockchains are Hyperledger Fabric and Quorum. The more secure these PoA consensus mecha- nisms are, the greater their complexity and, therefore, the greater their energy consumption. For example, PBFT consensus overhead scales at least quadratically with respect to the number of nodes in the network and is hence – by contrast to PoW and PoS – highly sensitive on the network size. This, in turn, correlates with the energy consumption associated with consensus. Beyond these popular consensus mechanisms, there are several more, an overview of which is provided by Eklund and Beck (2019). An example is Proof-of-elapsed-time, which intends to establish trusted random number genera- tors through secure hardware modules. As PoS and PoA, these further concepts typically do not involve a crypto- graphic puzzle, except for some concepts which try to establish some kind of ‘‘useful Proof-of-Work’’ which solves puzzles that are in some way meaningful for busi- ness or science. Since many of these types of consensus mechanisms are not currently prevalent in relevant appli- cations, and because they usually have low energy requirements compared to PoW, we will not investigate these consensus mechanisms in more detail. The main result of the discussion about blockchains with alternative consensus mechanisms is that, by getting rid of energy intensity by design, their energy consumption is orders of magnitude lower compared to PoW-blockchains. Consequently, the energy consumption of non-PoW blockchains can hardly be considered problematic for the climate. Yet, beyond PoW and, thus, on a completely dif- ferent scale, the type of consensus mechanism can have a significant impact on energy consumption. 4 The Impact of Redundancy on Energy Consumption We have already seen that a portion of blockchains’ energy consumption relates to consensus, and another portion relates to redundant operations. We have seen that for PoW blockchains, the energy consumption related to consensus outweighs the energy consumption associated with oper- ating transactions, so the redundancy aspect is usually not discussed in detail. For non-PoW blockchains, however, the energy consumption related to consensus is no more 123

PDF Image | The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology

PDF Search Title:

The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology

Original File Name Searched:

wi-1196.pdf

DIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing

NFT (Non Fungible Token): Buy our tech, design, development or system NFT and become part of our tech NFT network... More Info

IT XR Project Redstone NFT Available for Sale: NFT for high tech turbine design with one part 3D printed counter-rotating energy turbine. Be part of the future with this NFT. Can be bought and sold but only one design NFT exists. Royalties go to the developer (Infinity) to keep enhancing design and applications... More Info

Infinity Turbine IT XR Project Redstone Design: NFT for sale... NFT for high tech turbine design with one part 3D printed counter-rotating energy turbine. Includes all rights to this turbine design, including license for Fluid Handling Block I and II for the turbine assembly and housing. The NFT includes the blueprints (cad/cam), revenue streams, and all future development of the IT XR Project Redstone... More Info

Infinity Turbine ROT Radial Outflow Turbine 24 Design and Worldwide Rights: NFT for sale... NFT for the ROT 24 energy turbine. Be part of the future with this NFT. This design can be bought and sold but only one design NFT exists. You may manufacture the unit, or get the revenues from its sale from Infinity Turbine. Royalties go to the developer (Infinity) to keep enhancing design and applications... More Info

Infinity Supercritical CO2 10 Liter Extractor Design and Worldwide Rights: The Infinity Supercritical 10L CO2 extractor is for botanical oil extraction, which is rich in terpenes and can produce shelf ready full spectrum oil. With over 5 years of development, this industry leader mature extractor machine has been sold since 2015 and is part of many profitable businesses. The process can also be used for electrowinning, e-waste recycling, and lithium battery recycling, gold mining electronic wastes, precious metals. CO2 can also be used in a reverse fuel cell with nafion to make a gas-to-liquids fuel, such as methanol, ethanol and butanol or ethylene. Supercritical CO2 has also been used for treating nafion to make it more effective catalyst. This NFT is for the purchase of worldwide rights which includes the design. More Info

NFT (Non Fungible Token): Buy our tech, design, development or system NFT and become part of our tech NFT network... More Info

Infinity Turbine Products: Special for this month, any plans are $10,000 for complete Cad/Cam blueprints. License is for one build. Try before you buy a production license. May pay by Bitcoin or other Crypto. Products Page... More Info

CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@infinityturbine.com (Standard Web Page)