PDF Publication Title:
Text from PDF Page: 022
Materials 2020, 13, 4712 22 of 23 93. Choura, M.; Keskes, M.; Chaari, D.; Ayadi, H. Study of the mechanical strength and leaching behavior of phosphogypsum in a sulfur concrete matrix. IOSR J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol. 2015, 9, 8–13. [CrossRef] 94. Imbabi, M.S.; Carrigan, C.; McKenna, S. Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2012, 1, 194–216. [CrossRef] 95. Orlowski, J.; Leszczewski, M.; Margal, I. Stability of polymer sulfur concrete with steel reinforcement. Tech. Sci. 2004, 7, 101–108. 96. STARcrete. STARcreteTM is a Sulfur-Based Concrete with Unique Properties. Available online: http: //starcrete.com/durability.html (accessed on 22 March 2020). 97. Fediuk, R. Reducing permeability of fiber concrete using composite binders. Spec. Top. Rev. Porous Media 2018, 9, 79–89. [CrossRef] 98. Fedkin, N.M.; Li, C.; Dickerson, R.R.; Canty, T.; Krotkov, N.A. Linking improvements in sulfur dioxide emissions to decreasing sulfate wet deposition by combining satellite and surface observations with trajectory analysis. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 199, 210–223. [CrossRef] 99. Hu, B.; Li, Z.; Zhang, L. Long-run dynamics of sulphur dioxide emissions, economic growth, and energy efficiency in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 942–949. [CrossRef] 100. Chen,S.;Li,Y.;Yao,Q.ThehealthcostsoftheindustrialleapforwardinChina:Evidencefromthesulfur dioxide emissions of coal-fired power stations. China Econ. Rev. 2018, 49, 68–83. [CrossRef] 101. Brown,M.A.;Li,Y.;Massetti,E.;Lapsa,M.USsulfurdioxideemissionreductions:Shiftingfactorsanda carbon dioxide penalty. Electr. J. 2017, 30, 17–24. [CrossRef] 102. Liu,X.;Lin,B.;Zhang,Y.SulfurdioxideemissionreductionofpowerplantsinChina:Currentpoliciesand implications. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 113, 133–143. [CrossRef] 103. Peters, B.; Smuła-Ostaszewska, J. Simultaneous prediction of potassium chloride and sulphur dioxide emissions during combustion of switchgrass. Fuel 2012, 96, 29–42. [CrossRef] 104. Huang, J.-T. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and government spending on environmental protection in China-Evidence from spatial econometric analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 431–441. [CrossRef] 105. Smith, S.J.; Pitcher, H.; Wigley, T.M. Global and regional anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2001, 29, 99–119. [CrossRef] 106. Sullivan,T.;McBee,W.;Blue,D.SulfurinCoatingsandStructuralMaterials;ACSPublications:Washington, DC, USA, 1975. 107. Lin,S.-L.;Lai,J.S.;Chian,E.S.Modificationsofsulfurpolymercement(SPC)stabilizationandsolidification (S/S) process. Waste Manag. 1995, 15, 441–447. [CrossRef] 108. Yang,Z.;Cui,W.;Wang,K.;Song,Y.;Zhao,F.;Wang,N.;Long,Y.;Wang,H.;Huang,C.ChemicalModification of the sp-Hybridized Carbon Atoms of Graphdiyne by Using Organic Sulfur. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 5643–5647. [CrossRef] 109. Grugel,R.N.Integrityofsulfurconcretesubjectedtosimulatedlunartemperaturecycles.Adv.SpaceRes. 2012, 50, 1294–1299. [CrossRef] 110. Fediuk, R.; Smoliakov, A.; Stoyushko, N. Increase in composite binder activity. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2016; Volume 156, p. 012042. 111. Rassokhin,A.;Ponomarev,A.;Figovsky,O.Silicafumesofdifferenttypesforhigh-performancefine-grained concrete. Mag. Civ. Eng. 2018, 2, 151–160. [CrossRef] 112. Volodchenko,A.;Lesovik,V.;Volodchenko,A.;Glagolev,E.;Zagorodnjuk,L.;Pukharenko,Y.Composite performance improvement based on non-conventional natural and technogenic raw materials. Int. J. Pharm. Technol. 2016, 8, 18856–18867. 113. Svatovskaya, L.; Kabanov, A.; Sychov, M. Soling, aerating and phosphating for soil strengthening and detoxication. Procedia Eng. 2017, 189, 398–403. [CrossRef] 114. López,C.M.;Bueno,J.P.;López,M.M.;Araiza,J.R.;Manzano-Ramírez,A.Flyashlightweightmaterialof the cellular concrete type using sol-gel and thermal treatment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 206, 512–518. [CrossRef] 115. Prasad,R.;Mahmoud,A.E.-R.;Parashar,S.Enhancementofelectromagneticshieldingandpiezoelectric properties of White Portland cement by hydration time. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 204, 20–27. [CrossRef] 116. McBee,W.C.;Sulliven,T.A.;Jong,B.W.Modifiedsulfurconcretetechnology.InProceedingsoftheSULFUR-81 International Conference On Sulfur, Calgary, AB, Canada, 25–28 May 1981; pp. 367–388.PDF Image | Critical Review on the Properties and Applications of Sulfur-Based Concrete
PDF Search Title:
Critical Review on the Properties and Applications of Sulfur-Based ConcreteOriginal File Name Searched:
materials-13-04712.pdfDIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing
Sulfur Deposition on Carbon Nanofibers using Supercritical CO2 Sulfur Deposition on Carbon Nanofibers using Supercritical CO2. Gamma sulfur also known as mother of pearl sulfur and nacreous sulfur... More Info
CO2 Organic Rankine Cycle Experimenter Platform The supercritical CO2 phase change system is both a heat pump and organic rankine cycle which can be used for those purposes and as a supercritical extractor for advanced subcritical and supercritical extraction technology. Uses include producing nanoparticles, precious metal CO2 extraction, lithium battery recycling, and other applications... More Info
CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@infinityturbine.com (Standard Web Page)