Comparison of Alternate Cooling Technologies for California Power Plants Economic, Environmental and Other Tradeoffs

PDF Publication Title:

Comparison of Alternate Cooling Technologies for California Power Plants Economic, Environmental and Other Tradeoffs ( comparison-alternate-cooling-technologies-california-power-p )

Previous Page View | Next Page View | Return to Search List

Text from PDF Page: 026

to continue to rise for the foreseeable future. While water surpluses and shortages are distributed unevenly across the state, projections through 2020 predict likely shortfalls under average conditions and substantial shortfalls under drought conditions. 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Introduction Actual Projected Year California Water Use: Actual and Projected Figure 1-3 Electric power generation utilizes water in many ways and in varying amounts depending on the type of generating plant and the type of cooling system employed. The primary use of water is for the condensation of steam, often referred to as power plant cooling. There are several types of power plant cooling systems. These are commonly categorized as once-through cooling, recirculating wet cooling, dry cooling and hybrid, or wet/dry, cooling. These systems, which are described in more detail in later sections of this report, vary widely in the amount of water withdrawn from the environment and in the amount consumed in the plant through evaporation. In California, the use of once-through systems is largely restricted to existing coastal plants using ocean water for cooling. The focus of this report is on the cooling of inland plants using fresh surface waters or groundwater with either recirculating wet, dry, or hybrid wet/dry systems. Recirculating wet systems have been the usual method of cooling for inland plants in California and throughout the U.S since the mid-1970s. As will be developed in detail in Section 2, recirculating systems with wet cooling towers consume water at a rate of 10 to 15 gallons per minute (gpm) per MW of electric power generated with steam-driven turbines. A common metric for water use in electric power production used, for example, in the Environmental Performance Report of California’s Electric Generation Facilities (CEC, 2001a) is gallons of water per megawatt-hour (gal/MWh) of energy generated. The amount of water used depends not only on the type of cooling system used but also on the type of plant. Simple- cycle plants or combined-cycle plants in which most of the power is generated by gas turbines require no, or much less, water for condensation of steam, but they use water for gas turbine inlet 1-3 Urban Water Use, (thousand acre-feet)

PDF Image | Comparison of Alternate Cooling Technologies for California Power Plants Economic, Environmental and Other Tradeoffs

PDF Search Title:

Comparison of Alternate Cooling Technologies for California Power Plants Economic, Environmental and Other Tradeoffs

Original File Name Searched:

2002_07_09_500_02_079F.PDF

DIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing

NFT (Non Fungible Token): Buy our tech, design, development or system NFT and become part of our tech NFT network... More Info

IT XR Project Redstone NFT Available for Sale: NFT for high tech turbine design with one part 3D printed counter-rotating energy turbine. Be part of the future with this NFT. Can be bought and sold but only one design NFT exists. Royalties go to the developer (Infinity) to keep enhancing design and applications... More Info

Infinity Turbine IT XR Project Redstone Design: NFT for sale... NFT for high tech turbine design with one part 3D printed counter-rotating energy turbine. Includes all rights to this turbine design, including license for Fluid Handling Block I and II for the turbine assembly and housing. The NFT includes the blueprints (cad/cam), revenue streams, and all future development of the IT XR Project Redstone... More Info

Infinity Turbine ROT Radial Outflow Turbine 24 Design and Worldwide Rights: NFT for sale... NFT for the ROT 24 energy turbine. Be part of the future with this NFT. This design can be bought and sold but only one design NFT exists. You may manufacture the unit, or get the revenues from its sale from Infinity Turbine. Royalties go to the developer (Infinity) to keep enhancing design and applications... More Info

Infinity Supercritical CO2 10 Liter Extractor Design and Worldwide Rights: The Infinity Supercritical 10L CO2 extractor is for botanical oil extraction, which is rich in terpenes and can produce shelf ready full spectrum oil. With over 5 years of development, this industry leader mature extractor machine has been sold since 2015 and is part of many profitable businesses. The process can also be used for electrowinning, e-waste recycling, and lithium battery recycling, gold mining electronic wastes, precious metals. CO2 can also be used in a reverse fuel cell with nafion to make a gas-to-liquids fuel, such as methanol, ethanol and butanol or ethylene. Supercritical CO2 has also been used for treating nafion to make it more effective catalyst. This NFT is for the purchase of worldwide rights which includes the design. More Info

NFT (Non Fungible Token): Buy our tech, design, development or system NFT and become part of our tech NFT network... More Info

Infinity Turbine Products: Special for this month, any plans are $10,000 for complete Cad/Cam blueprints. License is for one build. Try before you buy a production license. May pay by Bitcoin or other Crypto. Products Page... More Info

CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@infinityturbine.com (Standard Web Page)