Comparison of Alternate Cooling Technologies for California Power Plants Economic, Environmental and Other Tradeoffs

PDF Publication Title:

Comparison of Alternate Cooling Technologies for California Power Plants Economic, Environmental and Other Tradeoffs ( comparison-alternate-cooling-technologies-california-power-p )

Previous Page View | Next Page View | Return to Search List

Text from PDF Page: 065

Cooling Technologies: the State of the Art In advance of the meeting, a list of discussion topics (see Appendix C) was prepared focusing primarily on how cooling systems are compared and on operating issues associated with dry cooling systems. In summary, the responses were as follows: • Dry cooling is never the system of choice on economic grounds. • Calpine had little operating experience to share since they had no dry-cooled plants in operation. Although the Sutter Plant, a 516-MWe 2 x 1 combined-cycle plant in Yuba City, California that went on-line in 2001, uses dry cooling, the system was chosen on other than economic grounds. A comparative analysis was carried out for the Acadia Plant (1080-MWe 4 x 2 combined cycle), which is currently under construction near Eunice, Louisiana, and is scheduled to begin operation in June 2002. A summary of the analysis indicated additional project costs of over $23 million for the use of dry cooling and an additional cost of $30 million over the life of the project in lost revenue from reduced power production attributable to the higher plant heat rate and lower capacity with dry cooling. Some rules of thumb included in the consideration of dry cooling are provided below: • Lost capacity for dry cooling equals 16 MWe on an average day and 28 MWe on a hot day, equivalent to 4 to 8% of the plant’s steam-side output. • Cooling systems are designed and compared at the design back pressure at the 1% temperature (temperature exceeded for 1% [88 hours] of the year). • Dry cooling saves approximately 80% of makeup water and 85% of wastewater discharge over a typical year. • The loss of 1 kW is approximately worth $1500 over the life of a project. • The capital cost of the dry cooling system is approximately three times that of a wet cooling system. • There is no value in reduced licensing time in the current business climate since licensing is not the pacing issue: Delivery times on combustion turbines ordered today are more than 3 years. The following anecdotal information on operational issues was provided by Calpine: • They have no experience with high back pressure turbines. • Wet enhancement with spray cooling was tried at a wood-burning plant near Sonoma, California, with attendant O&M problems. No details or explanation were available. • Calpine routinely uses fogging systems to cool gas turbine inlet air. They use de-mineralized water and have no problems. 3-12

PDF Image | Comparison of Alternate Cooling Technologies for California Power Plants Economic, Environmental and Other Tradeoffs

PDF Search Title:

Comparison of Alternate Cooling Technologies for California Power Plants Economic, Environmental and Other Tradeoffs

Original File Name Searched:

2002_07_09_500_02_079F.PDF

DIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing

NFT (Non Fungible Token): Buy our tech, design, development or system NFT and become part of our tech NFT network... More Info

IT XR Project Redstone NFT Available for Sale: NFT for high tech turbine design with one part 3D printed counter-rotating energy turbine. Be part of the future with this NFT. Can be bought and sold but only one design NFT exists. Royalties go to the developer (Infinity) to keep enhancing design and applications... More Info

Infinity Turbine IT XR Project Redstone Design: NFT for sale... NFT for high tech turbine design with one part 3D printed counter-rotating energy turbine. Includes all rights to this turbine design, including license for Fluid Handling Block I and II for the turbine assembly and housing. The NFT includes the blueprints (cad/cam), revenue streams, and all future development of the IT XR Project Redstone... More Info

Infinity Turbine ROT Radial Outflow Turbine 24 Design and Worldwide Rights: NFT for sale... NFT for the ROT 24 energy turbine. Be part of the future with this NFT. This design can be bought and sold but only one design NFT exists. You may manufacture the unit, or get the revenues from its sale from Infinity Turbine. Royalties go to the developer (Infinity) to keep enhancing design and applications... More Info

Infinity Supercritical CO2 10 Liter Extractor Design and Worldwide Rights: The Infinity Supercritical 10L CO2 extractor is for botanical oil extraction, which is rich in terpenes and can produce shelf ready full spectrum oil. With over 5 years of development, this industry leader mature extractor machine has been sold since 2015 and is part of many profitable businesses. The process can also be used for electrowinning, e-waste recycling, and lithium battery recycling, gold mining electronic wastes, precious metals. CO2 can also be used in a reverse fuel cell with nafion to make a gas-to-liquids fuel, such as methanol, ethanol and butanol or ethylene. Supercritical CO2 has also been used for treating nafion to make it more effective catalyst. This NFT is for the purchase of worldwide rights which includes the design. More Info

NFT (Non Fungible Token): Buy our tech, design, development or system NFT and become part of our tech NFT network... More Info

Infinity Turbine Products: Special for this month, any plans are $10,000 for complete Cad/Cam blueprints. License is for one build. Try before you buy a production license. May pay by Bitcoin or other Crypto. Products Page... More Info

CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@infinityturbine.com (Standard Web Page)