Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy

PDF Publication Title:

Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy ( supercritical-co2-brayton-cycles-solar-thermal-energy )

Previous Page View | Next Page View | Return to Search List

Text from PDF Page: 012

968 B.D. Iverson et al. / Applied Energy 111 (2013) 957–970 selection in high temperature receiver materials at a minimum for the next generation of solar power plants. 4.5. Impact on cost goals Comprehensive, critically reviewed costing data for the major components of a commercial sized (􏱢10MWe) recompression, closed-Brayton cycle for CSP applications were not found in the open literature. Private parties interested in developing compo- nents consider costing data proprietary. To fill this cost informa- tion void, Sandia National Laboratories, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and the Department of Energy (Office of Nucle- ar Energy) are initiating research into these various costs. The re- sult of this effort is intended to be a modeling tool that predicts the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for these systems and incor- porate the information into the current LCOE program that ORNL maintains. As the working fluid operates in the supercritical phase, the turbomachinery size [35] and cost may be lower but extensive recuperation will necessitate costly heat exchange. Assuming similar power block costs as that for steam-Rankine, the estimated impact of the proposed Brayton cycle to achieve SunShot goals is assessed using the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s System Advisor Model (SAM, https://sam.nrel.gov/). Assuming a molten salt power-tower plant model and adjusting the power block efficiency (54% gross) and receiver temperature (700 °C salt) to account for an indirect, dry-cooled, sCO2 Brayton cycle, the LCOE for a 100 MWe system has been estimated. In order to achieve 6 ¢/kW h (real), a solar multiple of 3.1 and 16 h of stor- age is required for the following SunShot-driven system: 􏱡 Cost assumptions: site preparation = 10 [$/m2], solar field = 75 [$/m2], power plant = 1,160 [$/kW], tower/receiver = 150 [$/ kWt], thermal storage = 15 [$/kWt], contingency = 0%, indirect (sales tax and land) = 17.8%, interest during construction = 6.0%, O&M = 40 [$/kW yr]. 􏱡 SunShot financial assumptions: discount rate = 5.5%, inflation rate = 3%, debt rate = 6%, state income tax = 5%, return on equity = 15%, debt fraction = 62%, federal tax = 35%, deprecia- tion = 5 yr MACRS, ITC = 0%. Of particular note are the large solar multiple and 16 h of stor- age required to achieve the desired SunShot LCOE target. This re- sults in a capacity factor of 73.1% and is in the range that a direct CO2 receiver/system cannot efficiently provide (see Fig. 7). Capac- ity factors of this magnitude must use the storage media in the re- ceiver, thereby requiring liquid-to-sCO2 heat exchangers of the type pursued in this proposal for implementing sCO2 Brayton to capitalize on the cycle efficiency benefits. 5. Conclusions The sCO2 Brayton cycle has been shown to have significant effi- ciency benefits especially as solar-thermal power plants increase their operating temperatures above 600 °C. In particular, part heat load operation, common to a solar resource, appears manageable especially for short durations (e.g. short-term cloud cover) due to thermal capacitance in the system and piping. Therefore it is rec- sented in this work and would approach approximately 24% with minor modifications to improve insulation. Predicted efficiencies still far short of the 50% thermal efficien- cies claimed for sCO2 at a 600 °C turbine inlet temperature. This is primarily a limitation of the laboratory-scale demonstration tur- bine used for the present study. At around 250 kWe in size, the test facility was intended to be large enough to confront the fundamen- tal issues for sCO2 Brayton cycle technology, but small enough to be affordable over several years of incremental funding. For adop- tion of sCO2 in a solar-thermal power plant, a number of required advances remain and are largely addressed by moving to larger equipment in 10 MWe range. For large capacity factors and indirect systems, heat exchange between CO2 and a secondary fluid amena- ble to solar is also required. This represents a significant challenge in terms of material selection as well as heat exchanger design. Improvements in bearings and seals to prevent leakage are also re- quired, especially as the system scales up from the small prototype included here. Acknowledgements This manuscript has been authored by Sandia National Labora- tories, a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by San- dia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. The authors would also like to thank Craig Turchi for assistance with the economic analysis. References [1] Hu E, Yang Y, Nishimura A, Yilmaz F, Kouzani A. Solar thermal aided power generation. Appl Energy 2010;87:2881–5. [2] Denholm P, Ela E, Kirby B, Milligan M. The role of energy storage with renewable electricity generation. NREL/TP-6A2-47187, January 2010, National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2010. [3] Denholm P, Hand M. Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity. Energy Policy 2011;39:1817–30. [4] Sioshansi R, Denholm P. The value of concentrating solar power and thermal energy storage. NREL-TP-6A2-45833, February 2010, National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2010. [5] Kolb GJ, Ho CK, Mancini TR, Gary JA. Power tower technology roadmap cost reduction plan. SAND2011-2419, April 2011, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM; 2011. [6] U.S. Department of Energy, SunShot Vision Study; 2012. [accessed 19.07.12]. [7] Sabharwall P, Kim ES, Patterson M. Fluoride high temperature reactor integration with industrial process applications. TEV-1160, March 29, 2011, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID; 2011. [8] Dostal V. A supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for next generation nuclear reactors. PhD thesis, Nuclear Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2004. [9] Dostal V, Hejzlar P, Driscoll MJ. The supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle: ommended that sCO lar-thermal energy applications. 2006;154:283–301. [10] Chen H, Goswami DY, Stefanakos EK. A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat. Renew Sust Energy Rev 2010;14:3059–67. [11] Utamura M, Tamaura Y, Hasuike H. Some alternative technologies for solar thermal power generation. In: International solar energy conference, July 8– 13, 2006, Denver, CO; 2007. p. 75–84. [12] Ma Z, Turchi C. Advanced supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle configurations for use in concentrating solar power systems. NREL/CP- 5500-50787, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO; 2011. [13] Turchi CS, Ma Z, Neises T, Wagner. Thermodynamic study of advanced supercritical carbon dioxide power cycles for high performance concentrating solar power systems. Energy Sustainability, July 23–26, 2012, San Diego, CA; 2012. [14] Conboy TM, Wright SA. Experimental investigations of the s-CO2 condensing Brayton cycle. In: Supercritical CO2 power cycle symposium, May 24–25, 2011, Arvada, CO; 2011. [15] Conboy TM, Wright SA, Pasch J, Fleming DD, Rochau G. Initial split-flow test results and path forward. SAND2012-5308292, September 2011, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM; 2011. 2 Brayton cycles continue to be pursued for so- Thermal, rotational and mass losses for this prototype cycle have been quantified and utilized to benchmark a cycle model with good agreement. Measurement of the system performance indi- cates an efficiency of approximately 5% for the operation condi- tions selected in this work. At design conditions, this efficiency is expected to increase to 15% using the benchmarked model pre- comparison to other advanced power cycles. Nucl Technol

PDF Image | Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy

PDF Search Title:

Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy

Original File Name Searched:

IversonArticle3.pdf

DIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing

NFT (Non Fungible Token): Buy our tech, design, development or system NFT and become part of our tech NFT network... More Info

IT XR Project Redstone NFT Available for Sale: NFT for high tech turbine design with one part 3D printed counter-rotating energy turbine. Be part of the future with this NFT. Can be bought and sold but only one design NFT exists. Royalties go to the developer (Infinity) to keep enhancing design and applications... More Info

Infinity Turbine IT XR Project Redstone Design: NFT for sale... NFT for high tech turbine design with one part 3D printed counter-rotating energy turbine. Includes all rights to this turbine design, including license for Fluid Handling Block I and II for the turbine assembly and housing. The NFT includes the blueprints (cad/cam), revenue streams, and all future development of the IT XR Project Redstone... More Info

Infinity Turbine ROT Radial Outflow Turbine 24 Design and Worldwide Rights: NFT for sale... NFT for the ROT 24 energy turbine. Be part of the future with this NFT. This design can be bought and sold but only one design NFT exists. You may manufacture the unit, or get the revenues from its sale from Infinity Turbine. Royalties go to the developer (Infinity) to keep enhancing design and applications... More Info

Infinity Supercritical CO2 10 Liter Extractor Design and Worldwide Rights: The Infinity Supercritical 10L CO2 extractor is for botanical oil extraction, which is rich in terpenes and can produce shelf ready full spectrum oil. With over 5 years of development, this industry leader mature extractor machine has been sold since 2015 and is part of many profitable businesses. The process can also be used for electrowinning, e-waste recycling, and lithium battery recycling, gold mining electronic wastes, precious metals. CO2 can also be used in a reverse fuel cell with nafion to make a gas-to-liquids fuel, such as methanol, ethanol and butanol or ethylene. Supercritical CO2 has also been used for treating nafion to make it more effective catalyst. This NFT is for the purchase of worldwide rights which includes the design. More Info

NFT (Non Fungible Token): Buy our tech, design, development or system NFT and become part of our tech NFT network... More Info

Infinity Turbine Products: Special for this month, any plans are $10,000 for complete Cad/Cam blueprints. License is for one build. Try before you buy a production license. May pay by Bitcoin or other Crypto. Products Page... More Info

CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@infinityturbine.com (Standard Web Page)