Graphene Oxide Nanofiltration Membranes Silver Nanoparticles

PDF Publication Title:

Graphene Oxide Nanofiltration Membranes Silver Nanoparticles ( graphene-oxide-nanofiltration-membranes-silver-nanoparticles )

Previous Page View | Next Page View | Return to Search List

Text from PDF Page: 008

Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 454 8 of 13 Nanomaterials 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 14 of the four types membranes is 99.97%, 91.27%, 97.73%, and 95.61%, which increase by 0.12%, 13.36%, 11.86%, and 11.45%. The influence of the size of AgNP on rejection was also investigated. The rejection investigated. The rejection of GO-8 is lower than that of GO at same thickness. However, GO-20 has ofhGigOh-e8risreljoewcteiornthcaonmtpharteodftGoOGOat-8s.aWmehethnicthkenesiszse. HofoAwgeNvePrs, GisO33-2n0mh,atshheigrehjecrtrioejnecdteiocnrecaosems,pbauretdisto GOst-i8ll. hWighenr thaensitzheatoof fAGgON-P8.s is 33 nm, the rejection decreases, but is still higher than that of GO-8. FigFuigruer7e.7(.a()aT)hTehewwataetrerflfuluxxppeerrfoforrmaance,,and(b)therejectionoffRhhBB(2(200mgg/L/L))ooffGGOO, G,GOO-8-,8G,OG-O20-2,0, GOG-O33-3m3emmembrbarnaense.s. The size sieving effect is purported to be the dominant separation mechanism of nanofiltration The size sieving effect is purported to be the dominant separation mechanism of nanofiltration memebmrbanraense[s2[32]3.]M.Mieitetala.l.pprrooppoosseedttuniingtheinterlayerspaciingbyiinnsseerrtitoionnooffchchememiciaclaflufnucntciotinoanlal groguropusp, sp,oploylmymeresr,s,oorrnnaanoparticles, toacchhieievveeseslelcetcivtievesespeaprartiaotnio[n31[–3312,3].2T].heTrhefeorreef,otrher,etehtryepeetsyopfes of different sized GO/AgNP composite membranes were successfully fabricated to investigate the different sized GO/AgNP composite membranes were successfully fabricated to investigate the size size effect of inserted nanoparticles on nanofiltration performance. The water flux is supposed to effect of inserted nanoparticles on nanofiltration performance. The water flux is supposed to increase increase while the rejection decreases upon addition of larger sized AgNPs, which enlarge the interlayer while the rejection decreases upon addition of larger sized AgNPs, which enlarge the interlayer spsapcaincginogfoGfOGOshsehetest.sH.Hoowweevveer,r,ththeerreessullttwasnotexactlyasexpectted..BBeessididesesinintetrelralyaiynigngspsapcaincign,g, wewceocnocnlucdluedtehtahtadtedfefcetcstsininththeeGGOOnnaannoossheeettshouldalsoberegardedassaaccrruucciaiallfafactcotorrinifnlufleunecnicnigng thethneanaonfiolftirlatrtaiotinonpeprefrofromrmananceceoof fGGOOmeembbrraanee.. Scheme 2 shows a schematic of the proposed separation mechanism of GO/AgNP composite Scheme 2 shows a schematic of the proposed separation mechanism of GO/AgNP composite membranes. Water molecules and RhB molecules pass through the defects first, and then RhB membranes. Water molecules and RhB molecules pass through the defects first, and then RhB molecules are blocked by the nanochannels between GO sheets while water molecules can permeate molecules are blocked by the nanochannels between GO sheets while water molecules can permeate the membrane. Larger-sized s enlarge the interlayer spacing (d3 > d2 > d1), but decrease the defect size the membrane. Larger-sized s enlarge the interlayer spacing (d3 > d2 > d1), but decrease the defect size (d’3 < d’ 2 < d’1), as demonstrated by AFM roughness measurements. When the size of AgNPs is 8 nm, (d’3 < d’2 < d’1), as demonstrated by AFM roughness measurements. When the size of AgNPs is 8 nm, the spacing between GO sheets is larger than that of GO membrane, however the the defect size is not the spacing between GO sheets is larger than that of GO membrane, however the the defect size is substantially altered. Therefore, GO-8 has higher water flux and lower rejection than GO. When the not substantially altered. Therefore, GO-8 has higher water flux and lower rejection than GO. When size of AgNP increases to 20 nm, the interlayer spacing continues to enlarge, while the defects become the size of AgNP increases to 20 nm, the interlayer spacing continues to enlarge, while the defects narrower. Both water flux and rejection of GO-20 are higher than GO-8. Because water molecules are become narrower. Both water flux and rejection of GO-20 are higher than GO-8. Because water much smaller than RhB molecules, the narrower defects can selectively reject RhB molecules with larger molecules are much smaller than RhB molecules, the narrower defects can selectively reject RhB interlayer spacing increasing water flux. However, the water flux of GO-33 start declines compared to molecules with larger interlayer spacing increasing water flux. However, the water flux of GO-33 thestoatrhtedremclienmesbcraonmeps,arbedcatuosteheofother33mnembAragnNePs,sbseicganuifisecaonfttlhyen3a3rrnomwAthgeNdPesfescigtsn,itfhicearnetbly rneadrruocwing thethweadtefreflctusx,.thTehrebryejreecdtiuocninogfGthOe-w33ataelrsofludxe.cTrehaesersejdecuteiotnoothfeGlOar-g33erailnsotedrleacyrerasepsadciunegt,ocothmeplaregderto theinGteOrl-a2y0ercosmpapcoinsgit,ecmomempabrreadnteo. the GO-20 composite membrane. Figure 8 shows the BJH adsorption pore distribution spectra of four types of GO membranes. Figure 8 shows the BJH adsorption pore distribution spectra of four types of GO membranes. The BET surface area of them was 8.9816 m2/g, 18.928 m2/g, 26.5457 m2/g, and 2.3405, respectively. The BET surface area of them was 8.9816 m2/g, 18.928 m2/g, 26.5457 m2/g, and 2.3405, respectively. The AgNPs loaded on GO increased the surface area of the membrane. However, the surface area The AgNPs loaded on GO increased the surface area of the membrane. However, the surface area of of GO-33 is smaller than that of GO. The pore width of them was 4.9386 nm, 4.6173 nm, 4.7303 nm, GO-33 is smaller than that of GO. The pore width of them was 4.9386 nm, 4.6173 nm, 4.7303 nm, and and 6.6469 nm, respectively; pore volume of them was 0.008756 cm2/g, 0.01912 m2/g, 0.03046 m2/g, 6.6469 nm, respectively; pore volume of them was 0.008756 cm2/g, 0.01912 m2/g, 0.03046 m2/g, and and 0.004254 m2/g. As shown in Figure 8a–c, pore volume is positively correlated to the size of AgNPs. 0.004254 m2/g. As shown in Figure 8a–c, pore volume is positively correlated to the size of AgNPs.

PDF Image | Graphene Oxide Nanofiltration Membranes Silver Nanoparticles

PDF Search Title:

Graphene Oxide Nanofiltration Membranes Silver Nanoparticles

Original File Name Searched:

nanomaterials-10-00454-v2.pdf

DIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing

Turbine and System Plans CAD CAM: Special for this month, any plans are $10,000 for complete Cad/Cam blueprints. License is for one build. Try before you buy a production license. More Info

Waste Heat Power Technology: Organic Rankine Cycle uses waste heat to make electricity, shaft horsepower and cooling. More Info

All Turbine and System Products: Infinity Turbine ORD systems, turbine generator sets, build plans and more to use your waste heat from 30C to 100C. More Info

CO2 Phase Change Demonstrator: CO2 goes supercritical at 30 C. This is a experimental platform which you can use to demonstrate phase change with low heat. Includes integration area for small CO2 turbine, static generator, and more. This can also be used for a GTL Gas to Liquids experimental platform. More Info

Introducing the Infinity Turbine Products Infinity Turbine develops and builds systems for making power from waste heat. It also is working on innovative strategies for storing, making, and deploying energy. More Info

Need Strategy? Use our Consulting and analyst services Infinity Turbine LLC is pleased to announce its consulting and analyst services. We have worked in the renewable energy industry as a researcher, developing sales and markets, along with may inventions and innovations. More Info

Made in USA with Global Energy Millennial Web Engine These pages were made with the Global Energy Web PDF Engine using Filemaker (Claris) software.

Infinity Turbine Developing Spinning Disc Reactor SDR or Spinning Disc Reactors reduce processing time for liquid production of Silver Nanoparticles.

CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@infinityturbine.com (Standard Web Page)