PDF Publication Title:
Text from PDF Page: 018
Processes 2022, 10, 812 18 of 19 36. Zhou, L.; Qu, Z.G.; Chen, L.; Tao, W.Q. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of gas-solid adsorption processes at pore scale level. J. Comput. Phys. 2015, 300, 800–813. [CrossRef] 37. Weber, T.W.; Chakravorti, R.K. Pore and solid diffusion models for fixed-bed adsorbers. AIChE J. 1974, 20, 228–238. [CrossRef] 38. Inglezakis, V.J.; Fyrillas, M.M.; Park, J. Variable diffusivity homogeneous surface diffusion model and analysis of merits and fallacies of simplified adsorption kinetics equations. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 367, 224–245. [CrossRef] 39. Haerifar, M.; Azizian, S. An exponential kinetic model for adsorption at solid/solution interface. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215, 65–71. [CrossRef] 40. Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Tsai, C.-J.; Yang, X.; Xing, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, P.; Webley, P.A. A numerical modelling study of SO2 adsorption on activated carbons with new rate equations. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 353, 858–866. [CrossRef] 41. Ma, Q.; Chen, Z.; Liu, H. Multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann simulation for flow, mass transfer, and adsorption in porous media. Phys. Rev. E 2017, 96, 13313. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 42. Moran, A.; Talu, O. Role of pressure drop on rapid pressure swing adsorption performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 5715–5723. [CrossRef] 43. Baghapour, B.; Rouhani, M.; Sharafian, A.; Kalhori, S.B.; Bahrami, M. A pressure drop study for packed bed adsorption thermal energy storage. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 138, 731–739. [CrossRef] 44. Myers, T.G.; Font, F.; Hennessy, M.G. Mathematical modelling of carbon capture in a packed column by adsorption. Appl. Energy 2020, 278, 115565. [CrossRef] 45. Qasem, N.A.A.; Ben-Mansour, R. Adsorption breakthrough and cycling stability of carbon dioxide separation from CO2 /N2 /H2 O mixture under ambient conditions using 13X and Mg-MOF-74. Appl. Energy 2018, 230, 1093–1107. [CrossRef] 46. Qasem, N.A.A.; Ben-Mansour, R. Energy and productivity efficient vacuum pressure swing adsorption process to separate CO2 from CO2/N2 mixture using Mg-MOF-74: A CFD simulation. Appl. Energy 2018, 209, 190–202. [CrossRef] 47. Ali Abd, A.; Roslee Othman, M.; Helwani, Z. Evaluation of thermal effects on carbon dioxide breakthrough curve for biogas upgrading using pressure swing adsorption. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 247, 114752. [CrossRef] 48. Ebner, A.D.; Mehrotra, A.; Ritter, J.A. Graphical approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling. Adsorption 2009, 15, 406–421. [CrossRef] 49. Ebner, A.D.; Mehrotra, A.; Ritter, J.A. Graphical unit block approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling of parallel interacting trains of columns and tanks. Adsorption 2015, 21, 229–241. [CrossRef] 50. Mehrotra, A.; Ebner, A.D.; Ritter, J.A. Simplified graphical approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling. Adsorption 2011, 17, 337–345. [CrossRef] 51. Ebner, A.D.; Ho, J.G.S.; Ritter, J.A. Graphical approach for formulating pressure swing adsorption cycle schedules with unlimited equalization steps. Adsorption 2018, 24, 221–232. [CrossRef] 52. Park, Y.; Kang, J.H.; Moon, D.K.; Jo, Y.S.; Lee, C.H. Parallel and series multi-bed pressure swing adsorption processes for H2 recovery from a lean hydrogen mixture. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 408, 127299. [CrossRef] 53. Liu, B.; Yu, X.; Shi, W.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, D.; Tang, Z. Two-stage VSA/PSA for capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) and producing hydrogen (H2) from steam-methane reforming gas. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 24870–24882. [CrossRef] 54. Lu, B.; Shen, Y.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, D.; Chen, G. Vacuum pressure swing adsorption process for coalbed methane enrichment. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 32, 264–280. [CrossRef] 55. Golmakani, A.; Nabavi, S.A.; Manovic ́, V. Production of negative-emission biomethane by twin double-bed pressure swing adsorption with tail gas sequestration. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 408, 127312. [CrossRef] 56. Chen, Y.-F.; Lin, P.-W.; Chen, W.-H.; Yen, F.-Y.; Yang, H.-S.; Chou, C.-T. Biogas Upgrading by Pressure Swing Adsorption with Design of Experiments. Processes 2021, 9, 1325. [CrossRef] 57. Van Chinh, P.; Hieu, N.T.; Tien, V.D.; Nguyen, T.-Y.; Nguyen, H.N.; Anh, N.T.; Thom, D. Van Simulation and Experimental Study of a Single Fixed-Bed Model of Nitrogen Gas Generator Working by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Processes 2019, 7, 654. [CrossRef] 58. Durán, I.; Rubiera, F.; Pevida, C. Modeling a biogas upgrading PSA unit with a sustainable activated carbon derived from pine sawdust. Sensitivity analysis on the adsorption of CO2 and CH4 mixtures. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 428, 132564. [CrossRef] 59. Subraveti, S.G.; Li, Z.; Prasad, V.; Rajendran, A. Machine learning-based multiobjective optimization of pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 20412–20422. [CrossRef] 60. Rebello, C.M.; Martins, M.A.F.; Rodrigues, A.E.; Loureiro, J.M.; Ribeiro, A.M.; Nogueira, I.B.R. A novel standpoint of Pressure Swing Adsorption processes multi-objective optimization: An approach based on feasible operation region mapping. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 178, 590–601. [CrossRef] 61. Capra, F.; Gazzani, M.; Joss, L.; Mazzotti, M.; Martelli, E. MO-MCS, a derivative-free algorithm for the multiobjective optimization of adsorption processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 9977–9993. [CrossRef] 62. Yang, L.; Zhu, A.; Shao, J.; Chi, T. A knowledge-informed and pareto-based artificial bee colony optimization algorithm for multi-objective land-use allocation. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2018, 7, 63. [CrossRef] 63. Khajuria, H.; Pistikopoulos, E.N. Optimization and control of pressure swing adsorption processes under uncertainty. AIChE J. 2013, 59, 120–131. [CrossRef] 64. Nilchan, S.; Pantelides, C.C. On the optimisation of periodic adsorption processes. Adsorption 1998, 4, 113–147. [CrossRef] 65. Tsay, C.; Pattison, R.C.; Baldea, M. A pseudo-transient optimization framework for periodic processes: Pressure swing adsorption and simulated moving bed chromatography. AIChE J. 2018, 64, 2982–2996. [CrossRef]PDF Image | Numerical Research on the Pressure Swing Adsorption Process
PDF Search Title:
Numerical Research on the Pressure Swing Adsorption ProcessOriginal File Name Searched:
processes-10-00812-v2.pdfDIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing
CO2 Organic Rankine Cycle Experimenter Platform The supercritical CO2 phase change system is both a heat pump and organic rankine cycle which can be used for those purposes and as a supercritical extractor for advanced subcritical and supercritical extraction technology. Uses include producing nanoparticles, precious metal CO2 extraction, lithium battery recycling, and other applications... More Info
Heat Pumps CO2 ORC Heat Pump System Platform More Info
| CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@infinityturbine.com | RSS | AMP |